Message185191
> I'm not sure that's correct, unless only Steven has ever contributed
> to it. To be correct, you'd have to list all significant contributors.
Well, then add "and contributors" :) But we have quite a few files with such a header (one person), which would be wrong.
> But still, the maintenance burden of per-file copyright headers
> (including the need to bump dates now and then) is non-negligible and
> doesn't seem worth the hassle.
Agreed.
For the OP, it's probably fine for Chromium to put a license header into their own copy of the file. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-03-25 07:26:44 | georg.brandl | set | recipients:
+ georg.brandl, pitrou, tshepang, David.James |
2013-03-25 07:26:44 | georg.brandl | set | messageid: <1364196404.1.0.154205206807.issue17514@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-03-25 07:26:44 | georg.brandl | link | issue17514 messages |
2013-03-25 07:26:44 | georg.brandl | create | |
|