This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ezio.melotti
Recipients docs@python, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, techtonik
Date 2013-03-21.16:26:03
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1363883163.64.0.645039544554.issue17494@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Using "first" makes some sense, since it's talking about "previous", but I agree it might be confused with the top frame too.  What about this wording then:
-f_back is to the previous stack frame (towards the caller),
-or None if this is the bottom stack frame;
+f_back is to the previous stack frame (towards the caller),
+or None if this is the first frame at the bottom of the stack;
History
Date User Action Args
2013-03-21 16:26:03ezio.melottisetrecipients: + ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, techtonik, docs@python
2013-03-21 16:26:03ezio.melottisetmessageid: <1363883163.64.0.645039544554.issue17494@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-03-21 16:26:03ezio.melottilinkissue17494 messages
2013-03-21 16:26:03ezio.melotticreate