Message 184101 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	r.david.murray
Recipients	ezio.melotti, flying sheep, r.david.murray
Date	2013-03-13.18:32:12
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1363199532.72.0.0700357521885.issue17410@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I think that in order to maintain backward compatibility the existing parse_ names should continue to have the same signature, but they could be re-implemented in terms of new versions that return the token. That way if an application overrides the methods for some reason that existing code should continue to work.

I think that in order to maintain backward compatibility the existing parse_ names should continue to have the same signature, but they could be re-implemented in terms of new versions that return the token.  That way if an application overrides the methods for some reason that existing code should continue to work.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013-03-13 18:32:12	r.david.murray	set	recipients: + r.david.murray, ezio.melotti, flying sheep
2013-03-13 18:32:12	r.david.murray	set	messageid: <1363199532.72.0.0700357521885.issue17410@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-03-13 18:32:12	r.david.murray	link	issue17410 messages
2013-03-13 18:32:12	r.david.murray	create