This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author terry.reedy
Recipients georg.brandl, keakon, spookylukey, terry.reedy
Date 2013-03-09.01:23:15
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1362792196.56.0.596314423788.issue17340@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Code behaving as documented is not a bug for tracker purposes.  Adding a parameter to allow new behavior is an enhancement for a future release. 

Who is responsible for the invalid cookie. Pardon my ignorance, but if tornado re-sets the cookie, why cannot it read it the next time?

If the existing test suite tests for CookieError for invalid cookies, writing tests for strict=False (return instead of CookieError) would be trivial.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-03-09 01:23:16terry.reedysetrecipients: + terry.reedy, georg.brandl, spookylukey, keakon
2013-03-09 01:23:16terry.reedysetmessageid: <1362792196.56.0.596314423788.issue17340@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-03-09 01:23:16terry.reedylinkissue17340 messages
2013-03-09 01:23:15terry.reedycreate