Message183415
R. David Murray,
You are right it is not specific to the client library. HTTP headers are part of the message (Request/Response) with both the same constraints. Constraints are put on receivers (receiving a message) and senders (sending a message) of the message (which is not specifically related to client or server).
Maybe the way forward in the future is to have a header factory shared by all HTTP libs? I noticed that http.client and http.server had similar issues:
in http.server
send_header
in http.client
putheader
Which are similar features aka constructing headers for sending with the message.
And what would be the elegant way to solve this current bug?
Ah… before I forget… The WG is having a meeting in 2 weeks. To make a summary of the HTTPBIS work. See the agenda.
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/agenda?item=agenda-86-httpbis.html
The current documents are in Last Call with no issues unresolved.
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/20
So if R. David is worried that it will change, we can wait a bit more before taking actions, if we are going the way of removing leading/trailing spaces. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-03-04 03:50:35 | karlcow | set | recipients:
+ karlcow, orsenthil, r.david.murray |
2013-03-04 03:50:35 | karlcow | set | messageid: <1362369035.24.0.904841893118.issue17322@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-03-04 03:50:35 | karlcow | link | issue17322 messages |
2013-03-04 03:50:34 | karlcow | create | |
|