➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author terry.reedy
Recipients cvrebert, daniel.urban, docs@python, ezio.melotti, terry.reedy
Date 2013-02-28.20:38:01
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1362083881.66.0.406211986129.issue17279@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
From the current python-ideas 'range' thread:
Me: Would it be correct to say (now) that all 4 are intentional omissions? and not merely oversights?
Nick: Yes, I think so. People will have to be *real* convincing to explain a case where composition isn't a more appropriate solution.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-02-28 20:38:01terry.reedysetrecipients: + terry.reedy, ezio.melotti, cvrebert, daniel.urban, docs@python
2013-02-28 20:38:01terry.reedysetmessageid: <1362083881.66.0.406211986129.issue17279@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-02-28 20:38:01terry.reedylinkissue17279 messages
2013-02-28 20:38:01terry.reedycreate