Perfect is the enemy of good. I vote for just committing it, then Chris can
propose additional fixes/changes in a subsequent patch.
On 26 Feb 2013 09:52, "Chris Jerdonek" <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
>
> > I still fail to understand what are you trying to achieve.
>
> My goal is to reach consensus on changes and have them committed.  In its
> current form, I don't agree with the patch.  The length of the comment
> thread and the length of the patch has discouraged me from raising most of
> my comments, because I'm fairly certain my comments will lead to
> back-and-forth discussion which will make the thread even longer.  That's
> why I want to break things up.
>
> I want to be clear that I'm not against the goals of the patch, so I'm not
> trying to "block" or stalemate anything.   I just have concerns I would
> like to discuss which is what the review process is supposed to allow.
>  Needless to say, I know what it feels like to have a patch reviewed in
> detail (which I'm not necessarily planning to do).  On the plus side, it's
> much better than comments being against the patch outright in any form.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14468>
> _______________________________________
>