Message 182866 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	Ramchandra Apte, eric.snow, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2013-02-24.10:27:06
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1361701417.3480.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to	<1361698903.08.0.370267722465.issue17100@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> Perhaps for consistency with popitem() and move_to_end() it is worth > to merge rotate_at() and rotate_after() in one method (rotate_to()? > move_to()?) with a boolean parameter. Yes, perhaps. rotate_to(last=False) sounds ok, but perhaps a native English speaker can suggest a better name.

> Perhaps for consistency with popitem() and move_to_end() it is worth
> to merge rotate_at() and rotate_after() in one method (rotate_to()?
> move_to()?) with a boolean parameter.

Yes, perhaps. rotate_to(last=False) sounds ok, but perhaps a native
English speaker can suggest a better name.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013-02-24 10:27:06	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, rhettinger, eric.snow, Ramchandra Apte, serhiy.storchaka
2013-02-24 10:27:06	pitrou	link	issue17100 messages
2013-02-24 10:27:06	pitrou	create