This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Hendrik.Lemelson
Recipients Hendrik.Lemelson, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, pitrou
Date 2013-02-20.17:55:43
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1361382944.02.0.85313570363.issue17257@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
When using the Python 2.7.3 re module, it shows a strange behavior upon the use of quantifiers together with groups:

>>> re.search('(a*)', 'caaaat').groups()
('',)
>>> re.search('(a+)', 'caaaat').groups()
('aaaa',)
>>> re.search('(a{0,5})', 'caaaat').groups()
('',)
>>> re.search('(a{1,5})', 'caaaat').groups()
('aaaa',)

Whenever a quantifier is used that allows also zero occurrences, the quantifier loses its greedy behavior. This in my eyes is a defect in the re module. In the following there is another example with nested groups where the quantifier for the outer group even prevents the inner groups to match:

>>> re.search('(a(b*)a)', 'caabbaat').groups()
('aa', '')
>>> re.search('(a(b+)a)', 'caabbaat').groups()
('abba', 'bb')
>>> re.search('(a(b*)a){0,1}', 'caabbaat').groups()
(None, None)
>>> re.search('(a(b+)a){0,1}', 'caabbaat').groups()
(None, None)

It would be great if you could manage to fix this.
Thank you in advance.

Regards
Hendrik Lemelson
History
Date User Action Args
2013-02-20 17:55:44Hendrik.Lemelsonsetrecipients: + Hendrik.Lemelson, pitrou, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett
2013-02-20 17:55:44Hendrik.Lemelsonsetmessageid: <1361382944.02.0.85313570363.issue17257@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-02-20 17:55:43Hendrik.Lemelsonlinkissue17257 messages
2013-02-20 17:55:43Hendrik.Lemelsoncreate