Author chris.jerdonek
Recipients Arfrever, Julian, Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, bfroehle, borja.ruiz, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, flox, fperez, hpk, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, serhiy.storchaka, spiv
Date 2013-02-11.03:37:34
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1360553854.64.0.243689160097.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
It seems like the last patch (subtests5.patch) dropped the parameter data from the failure output as described in the docs.  For example, the example in the docs yields the following:

    FAIL: test_even (__main__.NumbersTest)

instead of the documented:

    FAIL: test_even (__main__.NumbersTest) (i=1)

subtests4.patch is okay.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-02-11 03:37:34chris.jerdoneksetrecipients: + chris.jerdonek, brett.cannon, spiv, exarkun, ncoghlan, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, hpk, flox, fperez, Yaroslav.Halchenko, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle
2013-02-11 03:37:34chris.jerdoneksetmessageid: <1360553854.64.0.243689160097.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-02-11 03:37:34chris.jerdoneklinkissue16997 messages
2013-02-11 03:37:34chris.jerdonekcreate