Author pitrou
Recipients Arfrever, Julian, Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, bfroehle, borja.ruiz, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, fperez, hpk, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, serhiy.storchaka, spiv
Date 2013-02-10.11:57:54
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1360497287.3470.8.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1360496785.47.0.848210222048.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Subtests break the current unittest api of suite.countTests() and I
> fear they will also break tools that use the existing test result api
> to generate junit xml for continuous integration.

It depends how you define countTests(). sub-tests, as the name implies,
are not independent test cases. As for breaking tools, I don't really
understand what's special about junit xml. Why would a subtest failure
be different from a test failure in that regard?
History
Date User Action Args
2013-02-10 11:57:54pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, brett.cannon, spiv, exarkun, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, hpk, fperez, chris.jerdonek, Yaroslav.Halchenko, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle
2013-02-10 11:57:54pitroulinkissue16997 messages
2013-02-10 11:57:54pitroucreate