Author michael.foord
Recipients Arfrever, Julian, Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, bfroehle, borja.ruiz, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, fperez, hpk, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, serhiy.storchaka, spiv
Date 2013-02-10.11:46:25
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1360496785.47.0.848210222048.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Subtests break the current unittest api of suite.countTests() and I fear they will also break tools that use the existing test result api to generate junit xml for continuous integration.

I would like to add a "parameterized test" mechanism to unittest - but preferably in a way that doesn't break all the existing tools.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-02-10 11:46:25michael.foordsetrecipients: + michael.foord, brett.cannon, spiv, exarkun, ncoghlan, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, hpk, fperez, chris.jerdonek, Yaroslav.Halchenko, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle
2013-02-10 11:46:25michael.foordsetmessageid: <1360496785.47.0.848210222048.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-02-10 11:46:25michael.foordlinkissue16997 messages
2013-02-10 11:46:25michael.foordcreate