Author ncoghlan
Recipients Arfrever, Julian, Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, bfroehle, borja.ruiz, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, fperez, hpk, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, serhiy.storchaka, spiv
Date 2013-02-10.11:43:18
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
You can use subtests to build parameterized tests, you can't use
parameterized tests to build subtests. The standard library can also
be converted to using subtests *far* more readily than it could be
converted to parameterized tests. There's also the fact that creating
a decent parameterized tests without subtests support requires PEP

If you're telling us we can only have one, then I choose subtests, and
third party test frameworks can layer parameterized tests on top.
However, I think you're making a mistaking by seeing them as
*competing* APIs, rather than seeing subtests as a superior
implementation strategy for the possible later introduction of a
higher level parameterized tests API.
Date User Action Args
2013-02-10 11:43:19ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, brett.cannon, spiv, exarkun, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, hpk, fperez, chris.jerdonek, Yaroslav.Halchenko, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle
2013-02-10 11:43:19ncoghlanlinkissue16997 messages
2013-02-10 11:43:18ncoghlancreate