Author michael.foord
Recipients Arfrever, Julian, Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, bfroehle, borja.ruiz, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, fperez, hpk, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, serhiy.storchaka, spiv
Date 2013-02-10.11:26:45
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1360495605.88.0.971111076027.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Please don't commit I think we still need a discussion as to whether subtests or paramaterized tests are a better approach. I certainly don't think we need both and there are a lot of people asking for parameterized tests. I also haven't had a chance to look at how this affects existing tools that extend unittest by implementing the TestResult api (how they will cope with test suites using subtests).
History
Date User Action Args
2013-02-10 11:26:45michael.foordsetrecipients: + michael.foord, brett.cannon, spiv, exarkun, ncoghlan, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, hpk, fperez, chris.jerdonek, Yaroslav.Halchenko, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle
2013-02-10 11:26:45michael.foordsetmessageid: <1360495605.88.0.971111076027.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-02-10 11:26:45michael.foordlinkissue16997 messages
2013-02-10 11:26:45michael.foordcreate