Author neologix
Recipients benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, inc0, neologix, pitrou
Date 2013-02-07.07:31:15
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAH_1eM2SQeH24duUb2t9g7HqhAyEeZ+u=Cy0sbTpnFfNh6gTRw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1360181877.57.0.455929999026.issue16038@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Well, that is not from RFC (or I hadn't find it):) however I'd lie if I'd call myself an expert, should I change limit to 4096 then?

It's probably not in the RFC: this just shows that the limit chosen
should be enough.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-02-07 07:31:15neologixsetrecipients: + neologix, georg.brandl, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, inc0
2013-02-07 07:31:15neologixlinkissue16038 messages
2013-02-07 07:31:15neologixcreate