Message181269
Hi,
> the reason this stuff can't change [... is] backward compatibility.
Thanks, but this is still unclear to me. The required fix for code that would break because of the change I propose, is removal of dead code which looks misleadingly alive.
Is the backward-compatibility requirement really that strict? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-02-03 14:16:08 | shai | set | recipients:
+ shai, Arfrever, r.david.murray, docs@python, eric.snow |
2013-02-03 14:16:08 | shai | set | messageid: <1359900968.31.0.991070098502.issue17108@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-02-03 14:16:08 | shai | link | issue17108 messages |
2013-02-03 14:16:08 | shai | create | |
|