Message181038
Sorry for the delay and thanks for the suggestions Ezio and Nick.
> Given the lack of proper tests for iter_importers, wouldn't adding a
> proper test that returns something useful, rather than testing only
> with a non-existent module be better (this test could be kept, maybe
> converted to an assertRaises)?
I've added a test for iter_importers().
> (Note: There's a series of patches from Chris to move the walk_packages
> test to where it belongs in test_pkgutil, but they won't be applied until
> after the final 3.2 maintenance release has happened.)
Thanks for the info. These patches are in issue 15376, issue 15358,
issue 15403 and issue 15415, right? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-01-31 17:36:05 | berker.peksag | set | recipients:
+ berker.peksag, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, chris.jerdonek, eric.snow |
2013-01-31 17:36:05 | berker.peksag | set | messageid: <1359653765.76.0.514759348709.issue16163@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-01-31 17:36:05 | berker.peksag | link | issue16163 messages |
2013-01-31 17:36:05 | berker.peksag | create | |
|