Author pitrou
Recipients Arfrever, Julian, Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, bfroehle, borja.ruiz, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, fperez, hpk, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, serhiy.storchaka, spiv
Date 2013-01-29.07:20:56
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
> If the API is more like self.assert*()'s "msg" parameter which appends 
> data to the usual exception, then it will be the same as what people
> are already used to.

It might be a good idea to allow both this and the arbitrary parameter kwargs, then.

> I'm not advocating independent addressability/runnability of subtests
> or the following approach, but a naive way to do this would be to run
> the TestCase as usual, but skip over any subTest blocks if the
> parameter data isn't an exact match.

Well, I still don't know how to skip a `with` block (short of raising an exception that will terminate the entire test).
Date User Action Args
2013-01-29 07:20:56pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, brett.cannon, spiv, exarkun, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, hpk, fperez, chris.jerdonek, Yaroslav.Halchenko, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle
2013-01-29 07:20:56pitrousetmessageid: <>
2013-01-29 07:20:56pitroulinkissue16997 messages
2013-01-29 07:20:56pitroucreate