Author ncoghlan
Recipients Arfrever, Julian, Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, bfroehle, borja.ruiz, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, fperez, hpk, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, serhiy.storchaka, spiv
Date 2013-01-28.08:47:07
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1359362827.9.0.743077181396.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Right, if you want independently addressable/runnable, then you're back to parameterised tests as discussed in issue7897.

What I like about Antoine's subtest idea is that I think it can be used to split the execution/reporting part of parameterised testing from the addressing/selection part.

That is, while *this* patch doesn't make subtests addressable, a future enhancement or third party test runner could likely do so. (It wouldn't work with arbitrary subtests, it would only be for data driven variants like those described in issue7897)
History
Date User Action Args
2013-01-28 08:47:07ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, brett.cannon, spiv, exarkun, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, hpk, fperez, chris.jerdonek, Yaroslav.Halchenko, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle
2013-01-28 08:47:07ncoghlansetmessageid: <1359362827.9.0.743077181396.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-01-28 08:47:07ncoghlanlinkissue16997 messages
2013-01-28 08:47:07ncoghlancreate