Message180839
Right, if you want independently addressable/runnable, then you're back to parameterised tests as discussed in issue7897.
What I like about Antoine's subtest idea is that I think it can be used to split the execution/reporting part of parameterised testing from the addressing/selection part.
That is, while *this* patch doesn't make subtests addressable, a future enhancement or third party test runner could likely do so. (It wouldn't work with arbitrary subtests, it would only be for data driven variants like those described in issue7897) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-01-28 08:47:07 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, brett.cannon, spiv, exarkun, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, hpk, fperez, chris.jerdonek, Yaroslav.Halchenko, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle |
2013-01-28 08:47:07 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1359362827.9.0.743077181396.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-01-28 08:47:07 | ncoghlan | link | issue16997 messages |
2013-01-28 08:47:07 | ncoghlan | create | |
|