Author pitrou
Recipients Julian, Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, bfroehle, borja.ruiz, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, fperez, hpk, kynan, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, serhiy.storchaka, spiv
Date 2013-01-19.19:28:03
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1358623525.3619.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1358606971.41.0.253488148199.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> I think we're going to have to separate out two counts in the metrics
> - the total number of tests (the current counts), and the total number
> of subtests (the executed subtest blocks).

This is a reasonable proposal. On the other hand, it was already the
case that a single test could count for several failures (for example,
an exception in the test method and another in tearDown). Therefore, I
think it is independent from the subtest proposal and could be tackled
separately (which would also help keep this issue focussed :-)).
History
Date User Action Args
2013-01-19 19:28:05pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, brett.cannon, spiv, exarkun, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, hpk, fperez, chris.jerdonek, Yaroslav.Halchenko, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, kynan, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle
2013-01-19 19:28:05pitroulinkissue16997 messages
2013-01-19 19:28:03pitroucreate