Author pitrou
Recipients Julian, Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, bfroehle, borja.ruiz, brian.curtin, chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, florian-rathgeber, fperez, hpk, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, serhiy.storchaka, spiv
Date 2013-01-19.19:20:27
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1358623229.16.0.681603591445.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
The way expectedFailure is currently implemented (it's a decorator which knows nothing about test cases and test results, it only expects an exception to be raised by its callee), it's gonna be difficult to make it participate with subtests without breaking compatibility.

(that said, I also think it's a useless feature)
History
Date User Action Args
2013-01-19 19:20:30pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, spiv, exarkun, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, hpk, fperez, chris.jerdonek, Yaroslav.Halchenko, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, florian-rathgeber, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle
2013-01-19 19:20:29pitrousetmessageid: <1358623229.16.0.681603591445.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-01-19 19:20:28pitroulinkissue16997 messages
2013-01-19 19:20:27pitroucreate