Message 179973 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	sbt
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, ezio.melotti, pitrou, santoso.wijaya, sbt, socketpair, vstinner
Date	2013-01-14.19:55:51
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1358193351.48.0.0910036004229.issue12939@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
> Added some comments on Rietveld. > The .fileno() method is missing. Can this cause a problem when the file > is passed to stdlib functions? subprocess for example? Thanks. An older version of the patch had a fileno() method which returned the handle -- but that would have confused anything that expects fileno() to return a true fd. It would be possible to make fileno() lazily create an fd using open_osfhandle().

> Added some comments on Rietveld.
> The .fileno() method is missing. Can this cause a problem when the file 
> is passed to stdlib functions? subprocess for example?

Thanks.  An older version of the patch had a fileno() method which returned the handle -- but that would have confused anything that expects fileno() to return a true fd.

It would be possible to make fileno() lazily create an fd using open_osfhandle().

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013-01-14 19:55:51	sbt	set	recipients: + sbt, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, vstinner, ezio.melotti, santoso.wijaya, socketpair
2013-01-14 19:55:51	sbt	set	messageid: <1358193351.48.0.0910036004229.issue12939@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-01-14 19:55:51	sbt	link	issue12939 messages
2013-01-14 19:55:51	sbt	create