Message179913
B, yes.
So you would view the connection context manager acting as an actual transaction manager as a new feature? Would you be OK with adding that feature to the existing context manager in 3.4 (since currently the context manager is a noop in autocommit mode), or do you think we need to create a new context manager for this? Or do we do as the issue that sparked this (issue 8145) suggested, and just document how to create your own? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-01-14 01:16:10 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, loewis, ghaering, nagylzs |
2013-01-14 01:15:58 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1358126158.22.0.0656660966786.issue16958@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-01-14 01:15:56 | r.david.murray | link | issue16958 messages |
2013-01-14 01:15:52 | r.david.murray | create | |
|