This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients Arfrever, Ben.Darnell, brett.cannon, danielsh, eric.araujo, flox, georg.brandl, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger
Date 2013-01-13.10:19:19
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1358072218.3343.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> I'm not seeing a good justification for doing anything more, though:
> - needing to access this information is an exceedingly niche use case
> - I don't see any way for raw_argv to be useful in a cross-implementation manner.

I expect it to be useful in the "launch (almost) the same command in the
same way" situation.
Not that it happens often :-)
Date User Action Args
2013-01-13 10:19:20pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, brett.cannon, georg.brandl, rhettinger, ncoghlan, eric.araujo, Arfrever, flox, Ben.Darnell, danielsh
2013-01-13 10:19:20pitroulinkissue14208 messages
2013-01-13 10:19:19pitroucreate