Message179778
# TODO(jhylton): Should this be redesigned to handle
# persistent connections?
# We want to make an HTTP/1.1 request, but the addinfourl
# class isn't prepared to deal with a persistent connection.
# It will try to read all remaining data from the socket,
# which will block while the server waits for the next request.
# So make sure the connection gets closed after the (only)
# request.
headers["Connection"] = "close"
http://bugs.python.org/issue9740
this has been a long time..how many is annoyed by this..Count me in..
persistent connections may not be easy on various OS and act the same.
I'm just satisfied if it works on linux. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-01-12 08:22:59 | C19 | set | recipients:
+ C19 |
2013-01-12 08:22:58 | C19 | set | messageid: <1357978978.63.0.0191382102505.issue16942@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-01-12 08:22:58 | C19 | link | issue16942 messages |
2013-01-12 08:22:56 | C19 | create | |
|