This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients bethard, chris.jerdonek, r.david.murray
Date 2013-01-06.14:43:18
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1357483399.25.0.604350559892.issue16878@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I'd prefer to fix it, since having the action='append' and nargs='*' behaviors be different looks like a bug.  However, fixing it to match 'append' (default really is None) would be likely to break working code, so we certainly couldn't backport that, and I'd be really reluctant to fix it that way in 3.4, either.  (3) is thus preferable to (2), even though it leaves us with an inconsistency.  It would still be a judgment call on whether or not to backport it.  It seems like it would be reasonably safe, but such changes always worry me :)
History
Date User Action Args
2013-01-06 14:43:19r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, bethard, chris.jerdonek
2013-01-06 14:43:19r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1357483399.25.0.604350559892.issue16878@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-01-06 14:43:19r.david.murraylinkissue16878 messages
2013-01-06 14:43:18r.david.murraycreate