➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients docs@python, ezio.melotti, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, pitrou, sbt, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2012-12-31.16:22:29
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJKw+aEoTEGQ2QXVCt95DnzctRrM7wF9Jje+N=ezkGkOMw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1356967153.3.0.453339320289.issue16802@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
I recommend documenting it.

On Monday, December 31, 2012, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:

>
> Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
>
> Indeed. In any case, if this idiom is widely used, we can't hide this
> parameter and should document it (and perhaps document this idiom).
>
> If BDFL not want this parameter was made public, he would not have added
> it as an keyword argument. However, may be to ask him?
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org <javascript:;>>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16802>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2012-12-31 16:22:29gvanrossumsetrecipients: + pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, ezio.melotti, docs@python, sbt, serhiy.storchaka
2012-12-31 16:22:29gvanrossumlinkissue16802 messages
2012-12-31 16:22:29gvanrossumcreate