This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients Erez.Sh, William.Edwards, asksol, danken, dmalcolm, giampaolo.rodola, jnoller, neologix, pitrou, sbt, synapse, vstinner
Date 2012-12-31.14:26:34
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1356963873.3341.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> I know. I proposed something like that here:
> In theory all the necessary pieces are already there. What's missing
> is an agreement on what the API should look like, and that's the hard
> part 'cause it should be the most generic as possible.

Well, there was a lot of bikeshedding and pie-in-the-sky arguments in
that thread, but I think the original idea of a small wrapper is good
enough. Let Guido do the grand async shakeup separately.

Also, I've changed my mind: I think select would be an ok module for
this :)
Date User Action Args
2012-12-31 14:26:34pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, jnoller, synapse, asksol, dmalcolm, neologix, danken, Erez.Sh, sbt, William.Edwards
2012-12-31 14:26:34pitroulinkissue10527 messages
2012-12-31 14:26:34pitroucreate