Message 177539 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	asvetlov, eranrund, orsenthil, piotr.dobrogost, pitrou, slingamn
Date	2012-12-15.17:13:49
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1355591630.38.0.978543430703.issue16298@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Sorry for the delay. I am not sure I understand your concern here: > If the user reads the exact amount of bytes the server sent, read() on > the socket will never have a chance to return '' and inform the user > about the connection termination. Certainly read(), called once again, would return ''? That's how I understand your unit test anyway.

Sorry for the delay. I am not sure I understand your concern here:

> If the user reads the exact amount of bytes the server sent, read() on > the socket will never have a chance to return '' and inform the user
> about the connection termination.

Certainly read(), called once again, would return ''? That's how I understand your unit test anyway.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-12-15 17:13:50	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, orsenthil, asvetlov, piotr.dobrogost, eranrund, slingamn
2012-12-15 17:13:50	pitrou	set	messageid: <1355591630.38.0.978543430703.issue16298@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-12-15 17:13:50	pitrou	link	issue16298 messages
2012-12-15 17:13:49	pitrou	create