This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, asvetlov, christian.heimes, daniel.urban, eltoder, jcea, pitrou, python-dev
Date 2012-12-10.16:02:23
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1355155343.64.0.392755939068.issue16602@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> The only safe operation after PyWeakref_GET_OBJECT is to Py_XINCREF the 
> result. Should we provide a PyWeakRef_LockObject()?

There's already a warning in the docs about that. I don't think an additional function is useful here.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-12-10 16:02:23pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, christian.heimes, asvetlov, daniel.urban, python-dev, eltoder
2012-12-10 16:02:23pitrousetmessageid: <1355155343.64.0.392755939068.issue16602@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-12-10 16:02:23pitroulinkissue16602 messages
2012-12-10 16:02:23pitroucreate