This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients aliles, asvetlov, cjw296, eric.araujo, kristjan.jonsson, ncoghlan
Date 2012-12-09.11:42:49
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1355053370.19.0.43956450171.issue7741@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Good to know - I guess in most circumstances copy-and-paste already works, because the input will be arriving via a line-buffered IO stream.

I was thinking that with #16649 implemented, it would be possible to simply switch from "single" to "exec", without users needing to request the multi-statement support explicitly. However, I'm now back to wondering if such a change might have a few unforeseen consequences I haven't thought of.

So if that seems like too much of a risk to backwards compatibility, how about moving the "symbol" argument to __init__, rather than needing to supply it with each call to push?
History
Date User Action Args
2012-12-09 11:42:50ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, kristjan.jonsson, cjw296, eric.araujo, asvetlov, aliles
2012-12-09 11:42:50ncoghlansetmessageid: <1355053370.19.0.43956450171.issue7741@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-12-09 11:42:50ncoghlanlinkissue7741 messages
2012-12-09 11:42:49ncoghlancreate