Author chris.jerdonek
Recipients Jeremy.Hylton, anthony_baxter, barry, chris.jerdonek, docs@python, ezio.melotti, goodger, ncoghlan
Date 2012-12-03.05:34:13
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
> The "consisting" doesn't sound too well to me, maybe "reserved to"?

"Reserved for" sounds good to me.  Originally I was thinking of "limited to" or "restricted to," but that had a connotation of exclusivity I wanted to avoid.
Date User Action Args
2012-12-03 05:34:14chris.jerdoneksetrecipients: + chris.jerdonek, barry, goodger, anthony_baxter, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, Jeremy.Hylton, docs@python
2012-12-03 05:34:14chris.jerdoneksetmessageid: <>
2012-12-03 05:34:14chris.jerdoneklinkissue16581 messages
2012-12-03 05:34:13chris.jerdonekcreate