Message176678
This issue is to define "PEP editor" (or "PEP editors") in PEP 1 before it is used in the document and to provide certain clarifying information.
In particular, PEP 1 should say whether editorship is an invitation-only status and/or how one becomes a PEP editor. It would also be good if it said (for transparency) how to go about seeing the current list of editors.
There is also inconsistent singular/plural usage that I think would be good to clear up. Currently, in many places PEP 1 says "the PEP editor" (singular), so it's not clear if each PEP has its own editor, if there is a single PEP editor for all PEPs at any one time, or if it simply means "the PEP editor that happens to reply to an e-mail to peps@python.org".
PEP 0 also has this issue because its introduction says, "[This] PEP contains the index of all Python Enhancement Proposals, known as PEPs. PEP numbers are assigned by the PEP Editor, and once assigned are never changed." |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-11-30 02:00:10 | chris.jerdonek | set | recipients:
+ chris.jerdonek, barry, goodger, ncoghlan, Jeremy.Hylton, docs@python |
2012-11-30 02:00:10 | chris.jerdonek | set | messageid: <1354240810.61.0.280116049987.issue16581@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-11-30 02:00:10 | chris.jerdonek | link | issue16581 messages |
2012-11-30 02:00:08 | chris.jerdonek | create | |
|