Author ezio.melotti
Recipients eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, pitrou, python-dev, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, techtonik, zach.mathew
Date 2012-11-29.01:15:25
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1354151728.54.0.412352995159.issue16333@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> I noticed in the check-in mail that you added the note before
> the description of the separators argument

The note is just after the description of the indent argument, because it's relevant only when a indent value is specified.

> Regular text would have looked good to me.

I considered this, but I think it's ok.  I built the doc and the note is not too bad.  The other two alternatives were: 1) use a normal paragraph, but that would have broken the flow, since each paragraph describes a different arg; 2) write it in the same paragraph of "indent", but that would have made it less visible.

FTR I also closed the related issues #16476 and #16549.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-11-29 01:15:30ezio.melottisetrecipients: + ezio.melotti, rhettinger, pitrou, techtonik, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, zach.mathew
2012-11-29 01:15:28ezio.melottisetmessageid: <1354151728.54.0.412352995159.issue16333@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-11-29 01:15:28ezio.melottilinkissue16333 messages
2012-11-29 01:15:26ezio.melotticreate