Message176254
> > I wouldn't use "bytes-like object".
>
> What about "buffer-like object"?
"buffer-like" means "like a buffer" which is wrong on two points:
- "buffer" is not defined at this point, so the user doesn't understand
what it means
- we are not talking about an object which is "like a buffer", but which
"provides a buffer" |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-11-23 21:21:06 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, terry.reedy, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, skrah, chris.jerdonek, docs@python |
2012-11-23 21:21:06 | pitrou | link | issue16518 messages |
2012-11-23 21:21:06 | pitrou | create | |
|