This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients chris.jerdonek, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, pitrou, terry.reedy
Date 2012-11-23.20:32:34
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1353702697.3343.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> Do we have a recommended (and preferably briefer) way of saying, "any
> object that supports the buffer protocol"?

It depends where. There's no recommended way yet, but I would vote for
"bytes-like object" in error messages that are targetted at the average

The docs (glossary?) could explain that "bytes-like object" is the same
as "buffer-providing object" or "object implementing the buffer
Date User Action Args
2012-11-23 20:32:34pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, terry.reedy, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, chris.jerdonek, docs@python
2012-11-23 20:32:34pitroulinkissue16518 messages
2012-11-23 20:32:34pitroucreate