This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author chris.jerdonek
Recipients chris.jerdonek, docs@python, r.david.murray
Date 2012-11-23.17:58:20
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1353693500.81.0.114462951814.issue16523@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
+.. function:: attrgetter(attr[, attr2, attr3, ...])

Why not reword to use the *attr notation?  It is even already being used below:

+   The function is equivalent to::
 
       def attrgetter(*items):
           if any(not isinstance(item, str) for item in items):
History
Date User Action Args
2012-11-23 17:58:20chris.jerdoneksetrecipients: + chris.jerdonek, r.david.murray, docs@python
2012-11-23 17:58:20chris.jerdoneksetmessageid: <1353693500.81.0.114462951814.issue16523@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-11-23 17:58:20chris.jerdoneklinkissue16523 messages
2012-11-23 17:58:20chris.jerdonekcreate