This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients christian.heimes, gregory.p.smith, kristjan.jonsson, loewis, mark.dickinson, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2012-11-20.17:02:12
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> However, even if you cannot agree that it is a good idea, can you
> explain to me how it is a BAD idea?  How can expanding object
> references to strings to all objects, using the same mechanism, be
> bad?

It is a bad idea because features have to be supported in the long-term,
which means more maintenance effort. So, basically, this is the same
reason we don't accept every feature request + patch that gets posted
to the tracker.

And, again, I think the string interning part is a good thing.
Date User Action Args
2012-11-20 17:02:12pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, gregory.p.smith, mark.dickinson, kristjan.jonsson, christian.heimes, serhiy.storchaka
2012-11-20 17:02:12pitroulinkissue16475 messages
2012-11-20 17:02:12pitroucreate