Message 175867 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	docs@python, orsenthil, panzi, pitrou
Date	2012-11-18.11:38:27
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1353238657.3364.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to	<50A83A62.5010607@gmx.net>

Content
> On 11/18/2012 12:36 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > > - the patch needs a test (and docs too) > > - are you sure ignoring POSTed data is the right thing to do? Shouldn't we forbid it instead? > > Btw.: The file:// protocol handler also just ignores posted data, so I think the data url handler > shouldn't deviate from that. Either both raise an error when data is posted or none. Ah, fair enough, then. Thanks for the updated patch, I'll take a look (unless someone beats me to it).

> On 11/18/2012 12:36 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >
> > - the patch needs a test (and docs too)
> > - are you sure ignoring POSTed data is the right thing to do? Shouldn't we forbid it instead?
> 
> Btw.: The file:// protocol handler also just ignores posted data, so I think the data url handler 
> shouldn't deviate from that. Either both raise an error when data is posted or none.

Ah, fair enough, then. Thanks for the updated patch, I'll take a look
(unless someone beats me to it).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-11-18 11:38:27	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, orsenthil, panzi, docs@python
2012-11-18 11:38:27	pitrou	link	issue16423 messages
2012-11-18 11:38:27	pitrou	create