Message 175615 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	serhiy.storchaka
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, jcea, phihag, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2012-11-15.12:07:27
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1352981248.14.0.0876333017789.issue16465@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
> In the end, it's mostly a wash. Yes, it's predictable. The gain is too small and undistinguished on a background of random noise. May be more long-running benchmark will show more reliable results, but in any case, the gain is small. My long-running hard-optimized simulation is about 5% faster on 3.2 or patched 3.4 comparing to 3.3. But this is not a typical program.

> In the end, it's mostly a wash.

Yes, it's predictable. The gain is too small and undistinguished on a background of random noise. May be more long-running benchmark will show more reliable results, but in any case, the gain is small.

My long-running hard-optimized simulation is about 5% faster on 3.2 or patched 3.4 comparing to 3.3. But this is not a typical program.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-11-15 12:07:28	serhiy.storchaka	set	recipients: + serhiy.storchaka, rhettinger, jcea, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, phihag
2012-11-15 12:07:28	serhiy.storchaka	set	messageid: <1352981248.14.0.0876333017789.issue16465@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-11-15 12:07:28	serhiy.storchaka	link	issue16465 messages
2012-11-15 12:07:27	serhiy.storchaka	create