This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author chris.jerdonek
Recipients Juraj.Variny, bethard, chris.jerdonek, docs@python, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, terry.reedy
Date 2012-11-14.08:51:31
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1352883091.73.0.0238903581059.issue16418@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
To simplify the discussion and for issue resolution purposes, I propose that the discussion about "large" choices containers be divided into separate discussions for (1) changes that should be applied to all maintenance releases (i.e. bug fix changes), and (2) changes that should be applied only to the in-development branch (i.e. enhancements).

I propose that the current issue be used for the former.  3.4-only enhancements can be dealt with as part of a separate issue.

I also created issue 16468 for the bug that Terry observed above that ArgumentParser does not in general support "choices" values that support the "in" operator.  That issue exists and can be resolved independent of whether the choices collection is large.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-11-14 08:51:31chris.jerdoneksetrecipients: + chris.jerdonek, terry.reedy, bethard, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, docs@python, Juraj.Variny
2012-11-14 08:51:31chris.jerdoneksetmessageid: <1352883091.73.0.0238903581059.issue16418@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-11-14 08:51:31chris.jerdoneklinkissue16418 messages
2012-11-14 08:51:31chris.jerdonekcreate