Author pitrou
Recipients Thorney, eric.araujo, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, jackdied, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, rhettinger
Date 2012-11-14.07:16:35
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1352877352.3372.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> > Possibly reduce could be handled in a similar way with a fallback python
> > implementation? Otherwise your suggestion of conditionally adding it to __all__
> > makes sense to me.
> In the meantime I'd expect the import of _functools.reduce to not be
> wrapped in a try block.  Does that have an impact on coverage?

I tried to remove the try block, but when making the import
unconditional the tests fail with an ImportError (because reduce doesn't
have a pure Python implementation). I haven't investigated further,
since the try block doesn't look like a real issue to me.
Date User Action Args
2012-11-14 07:16:36pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, rhettinger, ncoghlan, jackdied, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Thorney, python-dev, eric.snow
2012-11-14 07:16:36pitroulinkissue12428 messages
2012-11-14 07:16:35pitroucreate