Message174910
These were not idle questions. I wrote the patch, and I had to know what behavior is correct.
Here's the patch. It fixes potential memory bug (unconsumed_tail sets to NULL in case of out of memory), resets the unconsumed_tail to b'' after EOF, updates unconsumed_tail and unused_data in flush().
I a little changed test for the previous case (here was O(N^2) for large data). I checked it on non-fixed Python, bug was catched. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-11-05 13:58:47 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, amaury.forgeotdarc, nadeem.vawda, python-dev |
2012-11-05 13:58:46 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1352123927.0.0.474792282563.issue16350@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-11-05 13:58:46 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue16350 messages |
2012-11-05 13:58:46 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |
|