Message174416
> I just wanted to ensure that there wouldn't be any bugs by my patch.
Okay, understood. Thanks.
Please note that this issue is now closed, though: the 2.3 compatibility workarounds have been dealt with. The use or non-use of dummy_threading has nothing to do with 2.3 compatibility and so is out of scope for the issue. You should feel free to open a new issue if there's a demonstrable problem or demonstrable room for improvement w.r.t. the way dummy threading is handled. (I'm personally not convinced that either of those is true, but others may have different views.) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-11-01 13:27:15 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, loewis, rhettinger, facundobatista, ezio.melotti, skrah, python-dev, Ramchandra Apte, zach.ware |
2012-11-01 13:27:15 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1351776435.32.0.261910224635.issue13701@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-11-01 13:27:15 | mark.dickinson | link | issue13701 messages |
2012-11-01 13:27:14 | mark.dickinson | create | |
|