This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author sbt
Recipients Erez.Sh, William.Edwards, asksol, danken, dmalcolm, giampaolo.rodola, jnoller, neologix, pitrou, sbt, synapse, vstinner
Date 2012-10-22.21:02:16
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1350939736.46.0.967163442656.issue10527@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> This problem affects any single use of select(): instead of using an 
> ad-hoc wrapper in each module, it would probably make sense to add a 
> higher level selector class to the select module which would fallback on 
> the right syscall (i.e. poll() if available, or /dev/poll on Solaris-
> like).

Doesn't Solaris have poll()?  If so then I don't see why one would want to use /dev/poll in the single fd case.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-10-22 21:02:16sbtsetrecipients: + sbt, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, jnoller, synapse, asksol, dmalcolm, neologix, danken, Erez.Sh, William.Edwards
2012-10-22 21:02:16sbtsetmessageid: <1350939736.46.0.967163442656.issue10527@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-10-22 21:02:16sbtlinkissue10527 messages
2012-10-22 21:02:16sbtcreate