This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients Erez.Sh, William.Edwards, asksol, danken, dmalcolm, giampaolo.rodola, jnoller, pitrou, sbt, synapse, vstinner
Date 2012-10-22.18:41:40
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1350931179.3366.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> Using poll() by default is controversial for 2 reasons, I think:
> #1 - a certain slowdown is likely to be introduced (I'll measure it)

That sounds like premature optimization. If you are concerned about that
you could add some caching of the poll object.

> #2 - current wait() implementation allows to specify a list of file
> descriptors and/or Connections objects. 
> select() can deal with both while poll() does not (it will return a
> list of integers rather than a list of Connection instances).

Well, can't you just create a mapping of the fds to the objects?

Your patch already has that problem by the way, and it's even worse
since it will trigger in random conditions (when some fd is > 512).
Date User Action Args
2012-10-22 18:41:40pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, jnoller, synapse, asksol, dmalcolm, danken, Erez.Sh, sbt, William.Edwards
2012-10-22 18:41:40pitroulinkissue10527 messages
2012-10-22 18:41:40pitroucreate