➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author jcea
Recipients btubbs, jcea, pitrou, pje
Date 2012-10-15.02:30:36
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1350268237.43.0.893794690171.issue16220@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Your patch is trivial enough, I am OK to integrate it as is, but it would be nice to verify that we are not reintroducing this bug in the future. 

I know that writing a the test will be far more difficult that writing the patch. You can try :).

Anyway I am OK to integrate current patch as is. Looks simple enough.

The comment in "run()" is a bit scary, and we could call "self.close()" twice, with this patch, or call extra code after "self.close()" is called. I don't know it that would be an issue, I am not familiarized enough with WSGI.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-10-15 02:30:37jceasetrecipients: + jcea, pje, pitrou, btubbs
2012-10-15 02:30:37jceasetmessageid: <1350268237.43.0.893794690171.issue16220@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-10-15 02:30:37jcealinkissue16220 messages
2012-10-15 02:30:36jceacreate