Message172798
Definite +1 on distutils needing to be fixed in the upcoming maintenance releases for 2.7, 3.2 and 3.3.
-1 on doing the strict path security checks on a normal invocation, -0 on doing them when -S or -E have been passed in, +0 if it is *just* a warning to users that they're doing something risky, but proceeds with normal (backwards compatible) sys.path initialisation.
For 3.4, I plan to have a look at the organically-grown-over-time mess that is CPython's current interpreter initialisation system and see if I can figure out something a bit more sane and easier to configure/control (especially when embedding Python in a larger application) :P |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-10-13 06:57:01 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, georg.brandl, vstinner, christian.heimes, schmir, robertwb, benjamin.peterson, tarek, eric.araujo, Arfrever, hynek, jdemeyer, Alan.Williams, vbraun |
2012-10-13 06:57:01 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1350111421.35.0.34459126625.issue16202@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-10-13 06:57:01 | ncoghlan | link | issue16202 messages |
2012-10-13 06:57:00 | ncoghlan | create | |
|