Author pitrou
Recipients christian.heimes, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2012-10-08.19:02:20
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1349722852.3361.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> > Ouch, sounds confusing. I would rather have PY_LITTLE_ENDIAN defined only
> > on little-endian machines and PY_BIG_ENDIAN only on big-endian machines.
> > (and PY_BYTE_ORDER isn't necessary)
> Why use two complementary boolean variables for a single boolean value (Python 
> does not support mixed endian in any case)?

Because it's simply more practical than having to remember which one
exists :-)

> There is WORDS_BIGENDIAN already.

A rather unfortunate IMHO.
Date User Action Args
2012-10-08 19:02:21pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, christian.heimes, serhiy.storchaka
2012-10-08 19:02:21pitroulinkissue16166 messages
2012-10-08 19:02:20pitroucreate