Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients christian.heimes, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2012-10-08.18:50:16
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> Ouch, sounds confusing. I would rather have PY_LITTLE_ENDIAN defined only
> on little-endian machines and PY_BIG_ENDIAN only on big-endian machines.
> (and PY_BYTE_ORDER isn't necessary)

Why use two complementary boolean variables for a single boolean value (Python 
does not support mixed endian in any case)? There is WORDS_BIGENDIAN already.
Date User Action Args
2012-10-08 18:50:16serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, pitrou, christian.heimes
2012-10-08 18:50:16serhiy.storchakalinkissue16166 messages
2012-10-08 18:50:16serhiy.storchakacreate